The observation of birds from a citizen science leisure project to systematic research
Contributions of a 10-year record in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico
Abstract
This article analyses historical data from observations made of birds in breeding season, throughout two routes with urban characteristics. The data were collected during a consecutive period of 10 years (2009-2018), following a precise methodology designed by the North American Breeding Bird Survey. The analyzed routes are officially registered in the Mexican Commission for Biodiversity’s Knowledge and Use, the United States Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, and the Canadian Wildlife Service Research Centre. The observations were made by citizens without formal professional education; hence the results may be considered within the framework of citizen science. Their contributions provided important data for decision-making regarding environmental issues, since the presence of birds is considered one of the main indicators of the health conditions of an ecosystem. Data analysis identified two basic conditions: (i) a reduction of the 23% in the number of species found, many of which disappeared during counting; and (ii) the significant increase in population of other species, including three species of pigeons. Apart from the study of variations in the numbers of bird species present in the routes with urban characteristics, the article acknowledges the lack of connection and use of this citizen science for decision-making and education regarding environmental issues. Therefore, we consider it crucial to create scientific observations that are available to both experts in the field and to the general population, which is the essence of citizen science.
References
Angulo, N. (2009). ¿Qué son los observatorios y cuáles son sus funciones? Innovación Educativa, 9(47), 5-17.
Bird, T., Bates, A., Lefcheck, J., Hill, N., Thomson, R., Edgar, G., Stuart-Smith, R., Wotherspoon, S., Krkosek, M., Stuart-Smith, J., Pecl, G., Barrett, N., & Frusher, S. (2014). Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biological Conservation, (173), 144-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037
Boakes, E., McGowan, P., Fuller, R., Chang-Qing, D., Clark, N., O'Connor, K., & Mace, G. (2010). Distorted views of biodiversity: Spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. PLoS Biology, 8(6), e1000385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385
Callaghan, C., Martin, J., Major, R., & Kingsford, R. (2018). Avian monitoring: Comparing structured and unstructured. Wildlife Research, 45(2), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17141
Cornell Lab of Ornithology. (2019). Citizen Science Central: History. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/citscitoolkit/about/history
Crall, A., Jordan, R., Holfelder, K., Newman, G., Graham, J., & Waller, D. (2013). The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, (22), 745-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511434894
Dueñas, L. (2012). Delicias, con los más altos niveles de cáncer y sin políticas de ayuda. La Crónica de Chihuahua. http://www.cronicadechihuahua.com/Delicias-con-los-mas-altos-niveles.html
Ehrlich, P., Dobkin, D., & Wheye, D. (1988). The birder’s handbook. A field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon and Shuster
Espino-Valdés, M., Barrera-Prieto, Y., & Herrera-Peraza, E. (2009). Presencia de arsénico en la sección norte del acuífero Meoqui-Delicias del estado de Chihuahua, México. Tecnociencia, 3(1), 8-18. https://vocero.uach.mx/index.php/tecnociencia/article/view/739
Finquelievich, S., & Fischnaller C. (2014). Ciencia ciudadana en la sociedad de la información: Nuevas tendencias a nivel mundial. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 9(27), 11-31. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/924/92431880001.pdf
Freitag, A., Meyer, R., & Whiteman L. (2016). Strategies employed by citizen science programs to increase the credibility of their data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.6
Geoghegan, H., Dyke, A., Pateman, R., West, S., & Everett, G. (2016). Understanding motivations for citizen science. Final report on behalf of UKEOF. University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England. https://www.ukeof.org.uk/resources/citizen-science-resources/MotivationsforCSREPORTFINALMay2016.pdf
Gómez, H., & Alvarado, E. (2011). Breve historia de la observación de aves en México en el siglo XX y principios del siglo XXI. Huitzil, 11(1), 9-20. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75615896003
Gouraguine, A., Moranta, J., Ruiz-Frau, A., Hinz, H., Reñones, O., Ferse, S., Jompa, J., & Smith, D. (2019). Citizen science in data and resource-limited areas: A tool to detect long-term ecosystem changes. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210007
Granados, L., González, F. (2019). Rumbos y extravíos de la educación ambiental. Destellos de un paradigma emergente. Sociedad y Ambiente, (19), 293-317. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.v0i19.1945
Gura, T. (2013). Citizen science: Amateur experts. Nature, 496(7444), 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7444-259
Haklay, M. (2015). ‘Nature’ editorial on citizen science. European Citizen Science Association. https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/blog/nature-editorial-citizen-science
Hurlbert, A., & Liang, Z. (2012). Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: Citizen science reveals effects of climate change. PLoS One, 7(2), e31662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031662
Impey, O., MacGregor, A. (Eds.). (1985). The origins of museums: The cabinet of curiosities in sixteenth- and Seventeenth- Century Europe. Clarendon Press.
Institute for Environmental Diplomacy and Security for Environmental Diplomacy & Security. (2015). The Ramsar Convention: A new window for environmental diplomacy? University of Vermont. http://www.uvm.edu/ieds/node/941
Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Biblioteca de Sonidos Aves de México (2019). Instituto Nacional de Ecología. http://www1.inecol.edu.mx/sonidos/menu.htm
Johnston, K., Macías, A., & Castillo, R. (2015). Aves urbanas en el desierto sonorense: Estimando densidades poblacionales a partir de conteos de puntos. Huitzil, 16(1), 13-47. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/huitzil/v16n1/v16n1a5.pdf
Kullenberg, C., & Dick, K. (2016). What is citizen science? A Scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
López, J., Ruiz, J., & Arellano, J. (2017). Diversidad de aves en gradientes urbanos, potencial uso recreativo y aviturístico en la ciudad de Guayaquil. Turydes, 10(22). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7932281.pdf
Manzano, P. (2019). Manual del observador de aves. Casa Chihuahua. http://www.casachihuahua.org.mx/Expos/171006_Pajaros/ManualDelObservadorDeAves_PatriciaManzano.pdf
Mondaca-Fernández, F., Navarro-Sigüenza, A., Moreno-Contreras, I., & Jurado-Ruiz, M. (2017). Species richness, phylogenetic distinctness and conservation priorities of the avifauna of the ‘Río San Pedro-Meoqui’ Ramsar site, Chihuahua, Mexico. Biodiversity, 18(4), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2017.1408032
Moreno, S. (2018). Violaron todas las prohibiciones en el Humedal de Meoqui. El Heraldo de Chihuahua https://www.elheraldodechihuahua.com.mx/local/violaron-todas-las-prohibiciones-en-el-humedal-de-meoqui-2017246.html
Moreno-Contreras, I., Mondaca, F., Robles-Morales, J., Jurado, M., Cruz, J., Alvidres, A, & Robles-Carrillo, J. (2016). New distributional and temporal bird records from Chihuahua, Mexico. The Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 136(4), 272-286. http://boc-online.org/bulletins/downloads/BBOC1364-PDFa.pdf
National Geographic. (2019). Citizen science. National Geographic Society. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/citizen-science
Naturalista. (2019). Rascón Azteca Rallus tenuirostris. Naturalista. https://www.naturalista.mx/taxa/367476-Rallus-tenuirostris
Orbe, M., Quispe, L., Pezo, R., & Acosta, A. (2016). Diversidad de aves en ambientes urbanos y periurbanos de la ciudad de Iquitos y Bosque de Varillal, Loreto, Perú. Conocimiento Amazónico, 7(1), 3-13. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/3288
Ortega-Gaucin, D. (2013). Caracterización de las sequías hidrológicas en la cuenca del río Bravo, México. Terra Latinoamericana, 31(3), 167-80. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/tl/v31n3/2395-8030-tl-31-03-00167.pdf
Palavecino, J., Vier, F., Villalba, L., Aguinagalde, S., Centurión, D., & Cirignoli, S. (2016). La observación de aves como propuesta en educación ambiental. TEKOHÁ, 1(4), 6-16. https://edicionesfhycs.fhycs.unam.edu.ar/index.php/tekoha/article/view/74
Pérez, L. (2019). Estudio jurídico-ambiental sobre la construcción del nuevo aeropuerto internacional de la Ciudad de México. Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental, (88), 4-34. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6939351
Planetary Science Institute. (2019). History of Citizen Science. CosmoQuest. https://cosmoquest.org/x/about-cosmoquest/history-of-citizen-science
Pocock, M., Chapman, D., Sheppard, L., & Roy H. (2014). Choosing and using citizen science: A guide to when and how to use citizen science to monitor biodiversity and the environment. https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sepa_choosingandusingcitizenscience_interactive_4web_final_amended-blue1.pdf
Ramírez, L. (2016). Distribución temporal de aves acuáticas en la sección Vado de Meoqui del río San Pedro, Chihuahua, México [M.Sc. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua]. http://repositorio.uach.mx/156
Roy, H., Pocock, M., Preston, C., Roy, D., Savage, J., Tweddle, J., & Robinson, L. (2012). Understanding citizen science & environmental monitoring. Final report on behalf of UK-EOF. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/citizensciencereview.pdf
Sanabria, I., & Sosa, P. (2018). Estudio preliminar de especies de aves presentes en zona urbana del Municipio de Tunja, Boyacá. Cultura Científica, (16), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.38017/1657463X.532
Sánchez-Aizcorbe, V. (2017). ¿Qué tan saludables se encuentran nuestras áreas verdes? Estudio piloto usando diversidad de aves como indicador [Bachelor Thesis, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia]. http://repositorio.upch.edu.pe/handle/upch/1326
Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano. (2018). Sistema Urbano Nacional 2018. Secretaría de Gobernación. https://www.gob.mx/conapo/documentos/sistema-urbano-nacional-2018
Silva, A. (2015). En agroquímicos y pesticidas el uso es indiscriminado: Luis Carlos Gonzáles. Código Delicias. http://codigodelicias.com/ver.noticia.new.php?id=48967
Snäll, T., Kindvall, O., Nilsson, J., & Pärt, T. (2011). Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring. Biological Conservation, 144(2), 804-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.010
Szabo, J., Vesk, P., Baxter, P., & Possingham, H. (2010). Regional avian species declines estimated from volunteer‐collected long‐term data using List Length Analysis. Ecological Applications, 20(8), 2157-2169. http://doi.org/10.1890/09-0877.1
Tejeda, I., & Medrano, F. (2018). El potencial de la ciencia ciudadana para el estudio de las aves urbanas en Chile. DU & P: Revista de Diseño Urbano y Paisaje, (33), 59-66. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6472318
Trumbull, D., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., & Cabral, A. (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, (84), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2
United States Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center & Canadian Wildlife Service Research Centre. (2019). Instructions for Conducting the North American Breeding Bird Survey. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. https://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/participate/instructions.html
Venegas, D., Díaz, M., & Cruz, J. (2015). Avoceta americana (Recurvirostra americana): Primeros registros reproductivos en Chihuahua, México. Huitzil, 16(1), 28-32. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/huitzil/v16n1/v16n1a6.pdf
Villaseñor, J., & Santana, E. (2002). El monitoreo de poblaciones: Herramienta necesaria para la conservación de aves en México. In H. Gómez, & A. Oliveras (Eds.), Conservación de aves, experiencias en México (pp. 224-262). COPARMEX.
Waibel, G., & Erway, R. (2009). Think globally, act locally: Library, archive and museum collaboration. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), 323-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314704
West, S., Pateman, R., & Dyke A. (2015). Motivations and data submissions in citizen science. Report to DEFRA. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/sei/documents/publications/projectreports/West-Pateman-Dyke-DEFRA-Data-Submission-in-Citizen-Science-Projects.pdf
World Health Organisation. (2019). Millennium Development Goals. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/about/en
Wright, D., Underhill, L., Keene, M., & Knight, A. (2015). Understanding the motivations and satisfactions of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of citizen science programs. Society & Natural Resources, (28), 1013-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976
